--- Comment #9 from Xan Charbonnet <[hidden email]> 2011-09-27 04:03:46 UTC ---
Once again you've correctly pointed out when I'm doing something not the XML
way. Obviously I need the help! It does make sense to be a little more
verbose in the XML, and let bzip do the work of making it smaller.
which I change by stripping the XML declaration, by removing the attributes on
the <record> tag, and by adding the "marc:" prefix to all the elements, thus:
<marc:leader>01172cam a2200301 4500</marc:leader>
So it's not an issue of the output of that module being invalid against the
official MARC XML Schema; it just needs a little massaging to fit into our
document. So I don't think it needs to be an upstream issue.