Quantcast

[Bug 18639] New: Separate replacement cost and retail price fields in acquisitions

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

[Bug 18639] New: Separate replacement cost and retail price fields in acquisitions

bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18639

            Bug ID: 18639
           Summary: Separate replacement cost and retail price fields in
                    acquisitions
 Change sponsored?: ---
           Product: Koha
           Version: master
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P5 - low
         Component: Acquisitions
          Assignee: [hidden email]
          Reporter: [hidden email]
        QA Contact: [hidden email]

Work to be done:

1 - Add a field 'replacementprice' to the aqorders table
2 - Display this field as 'Replacement price' when ordering
3 - Rename current 'Replacement price' field for orders to 'Retail price'
3a - 'Retail price' field will only be editable during initial ordering
3b - If 'Retail price' field is update, dependent fields will also be updated
(currently they are only updated on change of 'lsit price')
4 - Allow for replacementprice to be populated via ItemFieldsToOrder
preferences
5 - Adjust EDI scripts to allow for use of 'replacementprice' field
6 - Pass 'replacementprice' in aqorders through as 'items.replacementprice'
when creating items
7 - aqorders.replacementprice should be editable throughout entire acquisitions
workflow

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

[Bug 18639] Separate replacement cost and retail price fields in acquisitions

bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18639

Nick Clemens <[hidden email]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|[hidden email]-commun |[hidden email]-c
                   |ity.org                     |ommunity.org
                 CC|                            |[hidden email]

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

[Bug 18639] Separate replacement cost and retail price fields in acquisitions

bugzilla-daemon
In reply to this post by bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18639

Laurence Rault <[hidden email]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[hidden email]

--- Comment #1 from Laurence Rault <[hidden email]> ---
The trouble is that now the budgeted cost (ecost) is calculated based on
Replacement cost (rrp) and not (not only in fact) from vendor price (listprice)
anymore. And I think it may be bug :

When you change rrp in an order, budgeted cost does not change in the form, but
after validation, values in the table for budgeted cost are re-calculated
against the modified rrp.


Maybe we should consider alternatives :

1) make the budgeted cost only calculated from vendor price ; if rrp is
modified, no effect on ecost (as it is still the case in Koha 3.22). And then
make the rrp editable through the whole workflow. Would it be enough ?

2) I agree with your proposition, with some questions :
- what would be the difference between Vendor price and Retail price ?
- I am not at all familiar with EDI, but is the replacementprice sent or
received to/by the vendor ? I think vendor price and/or actual cost should be
(maybe the are already).

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
Loading...